Cognology
  • Products
    • 360 Degree Feedback
    • Competency Management
    • Compliance Training
    • Course Builder
    • Learning Management
    • Onboarding & Inductions
    • Performance Management
    • Profiles
    • Skills Management
    • Talent Management
  • Resources
    • Agile Performance Management
      • Balanced goals
      • How does performance management work?
      • How to write SMART goals and objectives
      • The Ultimate Guide To Agile Performance Management
      • What Remote Working Means for Performance Management, Plus 7 Other PM Trends
    • 360 Degree Feedback
      • What is 360 degree feedback?
      • How to run a 360 degree feedback process
      • 3 Easy Tips For Your 360 Feedback Questionnaire
    • Induction and Onboarding
      • Employee Onboarding Resources
      • Easy guide to a great Onboarding Process
      • Get the Onboarding Business Case Whitepaper
      • How To Switch From Face To Face New Hire Inductions To Online
      • Selecting an Onboarding System
      • Sample Orientation and Onboarding Program
      • Forms You Will Need For A New Employee In Australia
      • What Is Information Onboarding
    • Competencies & Skills
      • The Ultimate Guide To Competencies
      • What is a competency?
      • 7 reasons you should be using competencies
      • What is competency based assessment?
      • Competency Assessment Methods
      • Competency Assessment Template Form
      • Easy Guide to Competency Based Assessment Tools
      • Competency Management
      • What is skills audit?
      • How To Conduct a Skills Audit and Identify Skill Gaps
    • More about Performance Management
      • What is Performance Appraisal?
      • Performance Appraisal Template With Tips
      • What is performance management?
      • Social Performance Management Explained
      • What is talent management
    • Samples
      • SMART Goal Examples
      • Sample Goals and Objectives
      • Sample competencies
      • Sample competency review comments
      • Sample goal review comments
      • Sample development activities
      • Sample one-on-one check-in conversation notes
      • Sensitive items to avoid in feedback/comments
    • Learning & Coaching
      • A leaders guide to coaching
      • Coaching conversations
      • How to give feedback like a pro
      • How to conduct one on one meetings with team members
      • Seriously Good Learning and Development
    • More
      • Designing a Work-From-Home Policy: Where to Begin
      • How to Keep Employees Informed During a Crisis
      • How To Keep Staff Working From Home Productive
  • About
    • About Cognology
  • Ask Us Anything
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Jon Windust

Do organisations still use Position Descriptions?

December 2, 2013/in Performance Appraisals, Performance Management/by Jon Windust

Some years ago it wasn’t uncommon to find organisations where performance reviews were done by evaluating people against the Position Description for their role.  In my experience very few are doing this now.  I’m specifically referring to the traditional Position Description that provided an overview of the role and some of the inherent responsibilities, but not competencies, behaviours and strategically aligned goals.

So why aren’t organisations evaluating people against their Position Description to determine performance?  On the surface it would seem to make sense. The Position Description describes the role so why wouldn’t you evaluate a person against it.  Surely you can look at the Position Description and more easily understand if a person is meeting expectations or exceeding them.

Appraisal ratings

In the last 60 years, much progress has been made in understanding how to make performance and development processes work.  New ideas arise from time to time.  They are tested and some prove to work, while others fail in the real world.  It would seem that evaluating against the Position Description has proved the latter – it produces no benefit to the organisation and potentially does harm.  Why is that?

Issues meeting role expectations need to be resolved more immediately

If a person isn’t meeting the expectations of their role, leaving the resolution of this problem to formal performance review periods is leaving it too late.  Most organisations formally evaluate performance either quarterly, half yearly or annually.  Not solving the problem immediately and leaving it to one of these performance periods can potentially do harm to the organisation.  Managers need to coach people on a day to day basis if necessary to ensure people meet the minimum requirements of their role.

Position Description evaluations are too subjective

For any given team member, one manager could evaluate them as having met the role requirements, while another might rate them as having exceeded them.  It’s too subjective. A better and less subjective approach is to use measurable criteria like behaviours, goals or KPIs.

A Position Description describes your role, but it doesn’t tell you what great things the organisation is currently working on and what part you play.  But goals do.  Setting specific, measurable and actionable goals enables the organisation to align people to the strategic plan.  It helps people understand how they contribute and it stretches them.

More granularity is needed

To move forward, individuals and organisations first need to understand where they are now.  Reviewing a person against their Position Description tells you very little.  Whereas assessing people against a defined set of competencies or behaviours does, particularly if they are role based.  It gives the team member very specific criteria they can use to understand expectations and improve if needed.  It helps managers understand where to coach team members.  And it gives the organisation the ability to analyse its workforce to understand the gaps between required and actual capabilities.

Fairness and transparency

Under the old approach where performance is evaluated against the Position Description, it is difficult to demonstrate fairness.  For example, if one manager can evaluate someone as having met their requirements and another can rate them as having exceeded them, where is the fairness in the allocation of salary increases?  On the other hand, specific, measurable and actionable criteria like behaviours and goals are transparent.  It isn’t perfect, but it is a much more fair approach.  It also ensures that organisations spend their money (salary increases and bonuses) on the things that produce a benefit.  It doesn’t make sense for an organisation to trade money in return for someone exceeding their role requirements if that doesn’t provide a benefit.  But it makes a lot of sense to trade money in return for things that help to achieve the strategic plan.

Talent Retention

This is a huge area of tension for many large organisations in particular. Especially with the challenges in managing, retaining and motivating Gen Ys. The move away from traditional Position Description based performance management is a great tool to keep Gen Ys working hard. As one Gen Y team member told me, this is because this generation does not like hierarchy/seniority based performance management methods. Focussing on goals and behaviours allows the individual to feel more valued for their own ability rather than their position in the hierarchy.

That’s what I think.  What do you think?

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.cognology.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Position-Descriptions.jpg 90 100 Jon Windust https://www.cognology.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Cognology-logo-colour-300x101.png Jon Windust2013-12-02 07:00:072021-12-03 12:09:36Do organisations still use Position Descriptions?

Recent Posts

  • Course Builder
  • 7 Trends Driving Change in the Skills Landscape
  • How HR Can Boost Talent Retention, According to New Research
  • The Worried and the Well: How to Boost Your Employees’ Wellness in a Time of Crisis
  • The Quick Pivot at ACSQ

Subscribe

Get our latest news, tip and tricks

Receive our occasional newsletter

Products | Pricing | Resources | Blog | About | Contact

© 2021 Cognology

© Copyright Cognology 2019
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
What if one-on-ones were like an episode of The Voice?One-on-onesHow to identify skill gapsHow to identify skill gaps
Scroll to top